|
It's tempting to try to call attention to Kalavryta by emphasizing how
many were killed. But, all such massacres, whither it be that of Melos,
or My Lai, seem to share something ultimate that makes a mockery of any
ranking. The death of one person, the evil that produces it, and the grief
of those who loved him or her cannot be exceeded or multiplied by grouping
one death with others. The infinite agony of the human predicament, to
love life, and to also to have the will to deny life to others, however,
is more forcefully brought to our attention by mass evil. And all of these
massacres are linked, connected through some higher dimension. To pay
your respects at one, is to honor them all, and to be forced to contemplate
the meaning of all of them.
|
 |
It doesn't diminish Kalavryta that the Resistance did crimes that would
lead anyone to know that a reprisal would come. Nor am I saying that the
guilt of the solders is diminished in any way. The death of even one innocent
exposes the absurdity of any reasoning about what is deserved, what is
expected, what is justified.
|
|
But, there should be a monument to the murdered German captives as well,
a different sort of monument, in a different place. If the monument at
Kalavryta is a place of seeing with perfect clarity about violence, then
we need a monument for the Germans captives as a testimony about the inability
of humans to act on that clarity.
It helps that Kalavryta is hard to reach, at least, hard by the standards
of plush touring. If it were in the middle of Athens, it would have a
different meaning. It is well, I think, that we understand that such "forgotten"
"remote" and - according to the world - "useless" places as this remote
village have an infinite sacredness because of the human dreams that were
extinguished there. It is better that we have to confront the great emptiness
of our existence in the middle of nowhere. To appreciate a place like
this, you need the spiritual discipline of a journey as preparation.
|